doubleshiny: Michael Jackson (MJ)
( Jun. 26th, 2009 09:33 am)
It's funny how advances in technology not only affect the way we hear the news but also anchor us to moments we'll always remember, even if it's because we are answering the question "Do you remember where you were when....?"

Read more... )

I forgot all about the Saturn Awards until this morning, and I wasn't in the mood to make myself apoplectic with rage, so I waited until now to tell you all what the outcome SHOULD have been. I hope you appreciate this new 'temperate' DS. I have taken the liberty of holding my own awards - the name had to be a planet, and I had various problems with this, as all the good planets already have things associated with them, eg Mars, Pluto and the like. Uranus is very unpopular, given that it sounds rude. I think you readers are strong enough to deal with this without giggling

Go )Read more... )

Originally published in http://www.swinemagazine.co.uk/
Read more... )

Home Secretary announces that extremists are to be barred from the UK

This seems OK on the surface, but as I sat wearing my Heroes tshirt, drinking from my Heroes mug (which rested on my Sylar coaster as my Sylar action figure looked on in disgust) whilst watching Heroes and thinking about my new Heroes podcast at www.endofshow.com I realised that maybe I would count as some sort of Heroes extremist? I worry about these things, but clearly not as much as I should.
Read more... )
doubleshiny: (Brought This On Myself)
( Sep. 15th, 2008 11:48 am)
Originally published in Swine Magazine

Who’s up for a trip around Parliament Square then? A swift visit to the Churchill memorial, swerve Abraham Lincoln where some tourists from Arsecreek, Kentucky are posing, and past Benjamin Disraeli, whoever he is.
Read more... )

I am generally suspicious of headlines.  I always check quotations, context and tone when I'm told that someone has said something 'outrageous', so when I read on BBC News that actress Rose McGowan had announced that she would have been in the IRA if she was in Belfast in the 1980s I checked out the real sources. The quotations simply said 'My heart bleeds for the cause', which is nothing unusual. American IRA sympathy is something which makes me balk but it's been around for so long that you can hardly still get upset about it.  She was promoting her new film 50 Dead Men Walking, an account of the life of a British intelligence mole who infiltrated the IRA in the 1980s. She plays a 'femme fatale' IRA member, laughably.
Read more... )

I like the Writer's Block idea of writing a haiku about how your day's going. Here's mine...

My phone will not ring
I called communications
No-one will fix it

Sarah Palin has given her big speech and I just wanted to document how frightened I am of her. If the Republicans wanted to counter the feelgood-green-hope message of Obama's camp then they've certainly done it with this terrifying vicious nutjob who makes me want to actually abandon all hope and pack up for a new life on one of Jupiter's more hostile moons. Read more... )
Originally posted in Swine Magazine

As a lapsed Catholic there are really only two ways I could have attended the recent Richard Dawkins lecture at the Phil and not lost my saved seat in the afterlife. 1 – stand up halfway through and yell things at him, 2 – go on a comp and claim I was just there for the free bread sticks and a nice sit down.

I chose the latter.

Professor Richard Dawkins is now a major celebrity in the world of airport bookshop theologians. His book ‘The God Delusion’ has been printed in over 30 languages and has sold in excess of 1.5 million copies. Dawkins opens his lecture with these statistics, giving you a taster of how humble and unassuming he is. He follows with a slide showing the many titles which have been written purely in opposition to his work; “The Dawkins Delusion”; “Deluded By Dawkins”; “Intellectuals Don’t Need God and Other Myths”; and so on and so forth into infinity. Dawkins laps up this attention, to him it’s just further confirmation that the religious hate to be challenged. The first ten minutes of the hour long lecture are designed to impress upon any doubters in the audience the importance of Dawkins and his theories in today’s mondo-secular society.

Not that there are many doubters here. Most of them are outside with placards, one was chanting ‘Don’t let Dawkins make a monkey out of you’, alluding to the Professors stance on creationism. Inside the largest of the Phil’s lecture rooms those who don’t fully subscribe to Dawkins’ theories are notable by their absence. Every conclusion he reaches is accompanied by a silent chorus of nods, as if he is intoning some indefatigable truth rather than shooting religious fish in a barrel. I began to wonder why these people were here, paying £20 plus to hear what they already agree with, re-packaged with slides from the book they paid a tenner for.

The myth of Dawkins is more compelling than the fact. I was brought up as a Roman Catholic and though religion still plays some part in my life, usually through family ritual, I was ready for Dawkins to present me with something in the atheist position that I could agree with, or at least relate to. I was expecting this Oxford don to outsmart me in some way, to pose questions that I had no answer to. I was Dorothy, wandering down the yellow brick road to see the Wizard, and to match the analogy, I just saw an old man behind a curtain.

What Dawkins says is easy to say, make no mistake about it. Easier than telling people to ‘love thy neighbour’ certainly. He comes across not as an intellectual, or even a great speaker, but as a self-satisfied bore preaching to the converted. At one point he challenges God to strike him down with a thunderbolt – seeking attention from the deity he’s decrying as if the Almighty has nothing better to do than cut a jumped-up travelling salesman down to size.

Part of Dawkins’ problem is the dichotomy of belief vs. fact which he brings on himself and then can’t escape from. No matter how hard he tries, Dawkins can’t separate God and religion from physics and the universe. Even school aged children soon get over the idea of God as a man who lives in the sky, but Dawkins continues to rattle his bones over the lack of ‘proof’ of God’s existence. Much of his ‘lecture’ is concerned with making cheap digs at the religious, even reducing himself to mocking those who pray for their loved ones to recover from illness, literally sniggering at their belief that God has intervened when the much longed-for upturn in health arrives.

I was bored of Dawkins long before he got to the most distasteful part if the lecture, where he begins to pick away at single Biblical references. He obsesses over the Christian God and tellingly shies away from Allah, Buddha, Ganesh etc. After all, no-one likes the God he describes in ‘The God Delusion’, the Old Testament God who went Old School on the humanity after they started copulating with goats and murdering each others’ children because they were fed up. No, we like Jesus better, he even looks a bit like Brad Pitt in all those pictures and he everyone agrees her was a stand up bloke. Dawkins barely mentions Jesus, or that the basic tenets of Christianity are all concerned with being nice to each other and not breaking the law. He’d rather dwell on Genesis and the startling revelation that it MIGHT NOT ALL BE TRUE!

Throughout this lecture, Richard Dawkins never attempts to broach the simplest question of religion. Why do people believe? What exactly is in it for them? He rails against indoctrinisation but wants to indoctrinate us into atheism. He accepts no other belief system than his own, and delights in picking on the easiest of targets, like Ted Haggard, the American Evangelical preacher who was revealed to have a penchant for rent boys. It’s a good job that God hasn’t called an early judgement day because with this reasoning He might have seen Dawkins and junked us all. You can play this game with atheists too by the way, if he can ignore Mother Theresa and Father Damien of Molokai then I can ignore Baba Amte and Margaret Sanger and choose none other than Napalm Death to represent all Atheists. Don’t look so cool now do they?

During the dubious question and answer session (sample question : “Why are you so right, and where can I buy your books?”) a brave woman asked whether the survival of religion into the modern age when so much of it has been debunked by science could mean that religion has an evolutionary advantage. As you might expect, the answer was ‘I don’t know’, but it was preceded by a ridiculously complex and wordy answer which possibly only Dawkins himself will ever understand. I was bamboozled by the reply and so was the woman asking the question, as all other queries had been answered with plain English and very concisely. Dawkins had been rumbled and he pulled his secret weapon of academic waffle out the bag to send the woman back to her seat wondering why she bothered.

Comedian Matt Morgan recently compared Dawkins to Professor Yaffle from Bagpuss, commenting that his dismissal of all religiosity was similar to the woodpecker knocking the organ mice down to size with “It’s not a boat, it’s just a silly old shoe”. This sums Richard Dawkins up beautifully, he doesn’t allow for joy or hope in anything that can’t be quantified and proven. Take him to Westminster Abbey at vespers and he’ll probably prefer his own audio book on the iPod. Show him the Ali Mosque in Cairo and no doubt he’ll be tapping at the brickwork complaining it isn’t properly pointed. He may be the ‘Darwin’s Rottweiler’ to some, but he won’t shake of the Great and Powerful Oz analogy until he takes on some real opposition.
doubleshiny: (Technical Difficulties)
( Jul. 31st, 2007 11:51 am)
Daily life is full of decisions. What shall I have on my sandwiches? Where should I park? Should I download child pornography for the purposes of spurious ‘research’ into the area of childhood as a whole for a one line appearance in a BBC Three late night comedy drama, or is that a bad idea fraught with pitfalls?

Decisions, decisions, decisions. But in what form of reality could you reasonably be expected to decide whether you prefer a serial killer, a dwarf, or an animated crab? I’ll tell you where, in a land called Listopia, where even the most idiotic of people can claim to be film buffs because they can enthusiastically rate fictional characters depending on their resonance in their pathetic daily lives.

We all know that lists are big money these days. Lists on TV can last for six hours and straddle a whole bank holiday weekend, and will guarantee news coverage and promotion when the Daily Mail gets upset that ‘Gaz twatting Mozz’ is the nation’s best loved street crime on YouTube. Lists in magazines always guarantee big sales, because everybody wants to match their personal outrages with those of their film/music/tv heroes. “Jimmy Page better than Jimi Hendrix by one place! I’ll firebomb the offices of Mojo before I will allow this travesty to stand!”

Total Film magazine have already delivered their Top 100, as voted for by people who find Empire too mentally challenging. Readers placed The Empire Strikes Back at number one, rather predictably, in a list so masculine that it virtually sprouted chest hairs. The gangster, horror and sci-fi genres were so overwhelmingly represented that you get to number 18 in the list before you find a film with no violent deaths. Total Film have now unveiled the voting forms for their newest list, the Top 100 Movie Characters, and the result is a trip to Listopia so surreal and unfathomable that David Lynch must have been the guest editor.

Only in the fields of entertainment are enthusiasts expected, nay encouraged, to rate completely disparate paradigms against one another. In Annie Hall Woody Allen jokes about the pointless awards industry and wonder whether they will crown ‘Best Fascist Dictator – Adolf Hitler’. But that would at least draw some lines of comparison – Maggie probably wouldn’t make the cut if there was a panel involved - unlike the idea that a sci-fi film about killer robots can be judged equally against a Swedish language dadaist introspective about fruit trees.

To help those film buffs who don’t actually know or like any films, Total Film has compiled a list of characters to choose a Top 100 from. As well as fictional characters from literature (Atticus Finch from To Kill A Mockingbird, Gandalf) there are real people (Johnny Cash, Bonnie Parker) and all manner of weird inclusions. Nowhere does the magazine attempt to justify or explain its reasons for compiling this list. Is it to measure the skill of actors in taking a script and developing a character, including voice and movement? If so then Johnny Depp’s rendering of Captain Jack Sparrow is certainly a relevant entry. Caspar on the other hand owes very little of his ‘character’ to the voice actor playing him in the children’s movies. There’s a even a clue for the kid in the description ‘the friendly ghost’. Not rocket science really, just don’t make him a bastard platypus who speaks fluent German.

Elsewhere amongst the prescribed choices is ‘The Monster’ from Frankenstein. Unfortunately the IMDB lists four films called Frankenstein, including a frankly strange method attempt by Robert De Niro and the 1931 version with Boris Karloff. Other multiples occur with Alice In Wonderland (8 versions), Aladdin (3), and Cinderella (24). This would suggest that it is the character in general that is being celebrated and not the film character at all. If that’s the case, why is there Hightower from Police Academy, but not Dr.Jekyll? Are we voting for Jude Law or Michael Caine as Alfie?

There are so many errors and omissions in the list that it becomes painfully clear that the magazine is putting this out as a money making exercise. Who is Willy Wonker? What the fuck is Toy’s Story? Who is Romeo ‘Montigue’? Don’t they know that Danny Zucco is in Grease and not ‘Greece’? Or is this a straight to video version that I haven’t seen? Also, if the Total Film journalists are choosing the list from which to vote, should they not be fired immediately for suggesting that of the millions of characters ever committed to celluloid, the dad from Jumanji and the whale from Free Willy are among them?

In the October issue of Total Film, this feature will probably take up around ten pages. That’s ten pages that could have been used to discuss relevant and important issues in film, such as funding for independent films which haven’t been produced by George Clooney and don’t have Oscar nominees in them, or the state of British film industry, or the fact that cinemas like FACT in Liverpool are forced to screen summer blockbusters instead of foreign language films to keep on the sweet side of the distributors. Instead we have the eternal question – is Sebastian the crab better than Idi Amin? If only we didn’t have to wait til October to find out….
According to Professor Aric Sigman, a psychologist and biologist, children under 3 shouldn’t be allowed to watch television. Aged 3-7 they might be permitted half an hour a day. Aged 7-13 they can watch 2 hours. Any more than this and your child is liable to suffer all manner of problems, from ADHD to morbid obesity. "Screen media must now be considered a major public health issue” wobbles Aric. Strangely enough, he used to appear as the resident doctor on Going Live! which was over two hours long and therefore unacceptable for children’s viewing by his standards. I remember switching over immediately when he came on with his transatlantic drawl, trying to tell me about acne treatments when I wanted to see Trev hit Simon with a pie.

Who’d want to be a kid in 2007? Junk food will kill you, toy adverts are immoral, myspace will see you killed by paedophiles, television makes you fat. The poor little sods are cosseted from all sides by over-protective hand wringers desperate to preserve an idea of childhood that hasn’t existed outside of The Famous Five. We are in danger of producing a generation of defenceless weirdos who have no idea how to survive in the modern world. If parents absorbed all the media messages about how to bring up their children their heads would explode. Your child may not sit in front of the television but they may not be allowed outside in case a stranger kidnaps them for a starring role in his child porn videos. They may not eat junk food or too much salt, or sweets, or fizzy drinks, or more than one serving of oily fish, or red meat. In fact, why don’t we just suspend our newborns in saline filled pods until they reach 18, that way no harm can possible come to them and we won’t feel like Fred and Rosemary West because Cosmo ate a cheeseburger and then watched Dr Who.

Unfortunately this kind of relentless over-parenting has infiltrated television anyway. Any child allowed to watch TV after 7pm will see wave after wave of ‘bad’ children being fixed by Supernannys or Child Psychologists until they sit properly, eat their carrot sticks and go to bed at 8pm on the dot dreaming of another sticker on their behaviour chart. The BBC even has a parenting website where you can check up on where you’re going wrong. There’s a very helpful section on how to explain wars and conflicts to your kids. During the first Gulf War I remember writing a diary entry on the day the conflict began. I wrote with great detail and excitement about the new Sylvanian Families rabbit I had been given, and added at the end ‘PS War broke out’. I really didn’t give a shit about war and international politics, I assumed that if it got really bad, ie there were Iraqi soldiers marching down High Street, that school would be cancelled and my dad would probably sort them out. Now, parents are being told to sit their children down quietly and explain that ‘something bad is going on very far away but you’re safe here’. Of course we all know that this will actually scare kids shitless because they understand inherently that parents lie about everything. They will interpret this ‘chat’ as “We’re probably going to die soon, but please don’t make a fuss’.

Star charts are another method of breeding greedy brats who can’t cope without attention. The thinking behind them is that they encourage good behaviour by rewarding it. Eaten your dinner? Star! Gone to bed? Star! Stopped beating your brother with a wooden spoon for no reason other than it’s mildly diverting? Star! So what happens when junior gets to school and expects praise and rewards for behaviour he should be displaying anyway?
Will they have a star chart in his University classroom? Or in the boardroom? No. By this time he’ll have to get used to the fact that the vast majority of people behave well all of the time, and get bugger all benefit from it. Either that or he can siphon off interest from company pension funds into an offshore account for forty years and then spend five minutes on the naughty step.

The Sunday Supplement method of child rearing is even more vomit inducing. It generally involves skipping ropes and Mummy and Me Painting Classes and is the preserve of middle class upward movers who think that the childhood they never had is what should be afforded to their children whatever the cost. This imagined idea of what children enjoy doing is even more barmy than the Supernanny tribe’s. They spend hundreds of pounds on toys the same as the rest of us, only Harry and Olivia-Jane get hand made Cornish hoops and sticks or genuine Gloucester-built rocking horses that Dad saw on Countryfile. The children’s misery at being the only people in school who don’t know how to pronounce Wii is compounded by the weekends being rigorously timetabled with ballet, pony trekking, pottery and cello practice. Then, when Olivia-Jane gets happy slapped because she can’t weave herself a wicker shield quick enough, they take their kids out for ‘home schooling’, effectively ending their normal lives and consigning them to a future filled with Bee Identification courses at the local Ranger’s station because pubs are for morons.

“Screen media” is one of the few pleasures that kids are still allowed to enjoy. Where else is a child able to see a lion eat a gazelle? Toxteth? Is mum meant to fork out £25 on a ticket to see Manchester United play in the FA cup because 90 minutes is too long for a child to sit and watch it for free at home? I would like to challenge Professor Sigman to try and prevent my two year old sisters from watching Numberjacks. He won’t last five minutes.
Amid the recent Wayne Rooney debacle (this is the one where he sarcastically applauded a referee rather than the other 17 which will no doubt immediately follow), Sir Alex Ferguson was heard to remark that ‘He has a chip on his shoulder, like everyone from that City’. Cue an onslaught of po-faced indignation from Liverpool’s chief whingers at the very suggestion that any Scouser could be criticised openly in the press. In a passing comment. At a private function.
Liverpool ‘Business Representative’ (read stall holder) Frank McKenna immediately chimed in with that well-worn chorus, ‘People in Liverpool have a sense of humour and can take a few jokes made at our expense’. Could have fooled me Frank! Let’s look at the evidence…
October 2004 – Boris Johnson accuses Liverpool of ‘wallowing in misery’ following a three hour silence and commemorative dinner plate to mourn the loss of Ken Bigley, who once got on the X5 bus. Liverpool’s outrage is incandescent, and copies of Johnson’s Spectator article are burned in the street. April 1989 – The Sun publishes a characteristically incorrect story about Liverpool fans urinating on corpses and picking their pockets during the Hillsborough Disaster. The resulting bile on Merseyside lasted for over 15 years. Now I’m all for Sun-bashing, even when there isn’t a good reason, but 15 years? Not exactly characteristic of the easy-going live and let live Scouser we’ve been assured is the norm, is it now?

Where did this idea of the Funny Scouser come from? Was it simply an exercise in spin? An attempt to overhaul the old image of the thieving druggie Scouser with a bubble perm and someone else’s benefit book? The evidence for this Funny Scouser myth seems to be scant at best. Any lexicon of Scouse comedians tends to turn up the same half dozen names- Les Dennis, Ken Dodd, Ted Ray, Tommy Handley, Robb Wilton, Arthur Askey. So that’s one who has started his career within the last 30 years, and four who are dead. Hardly a Who’s Who of side splitting.

In 2002 there was a Liverpool City Council motion to open a Comedy Hall Of Fame in the Empire theatre. The plan only stalled when the list of probable inductees was read out and included, er, Les Dennis, Ken Dodd, Ted Ray, Tommy Handley, Robb Wilton and Arthur Askey.
Seeing as these are the Comedy Greats to whom Liverpool owes it’s genetic funny bone, let’s examine them a little more closely. Dodd made his name by making up words such as ‘tattyfilarious’ and brandishing a duster. I can almost hear you pissing yourselves at the memory. Les Dennis, the cuckolded Mavis impersonator whose shelf life ran out about the same time as Dustin Gee’s left ventricle. Thank God that woman said ‘my cardigan’ when asked to name something blue on Family Fortunes, otherwise we might never have heard from him again. Ted Ray was actually from Wigan and died nearly thirty years ago, and the last time Tommy Handley was cracking gags we were still mourning Queen Victoria. Robb Wilton was dead by the advent of television, which leaves Arthur Askey as the man chosen to shoulder the Comedy Greatness of Liverpool. I don’t know why all Scousers don’t visit his grave more often to pay their respects to the Godfather of that irrepressible Scouse wit. Maybe because he was buried in London where he escaped to almost immediately after leaving the womb.

Far from being the UK’s chuckle machines, there are few more humourless peoples than Scousers who have been slighted, or disagreed with, or looked at. Heaven forfend you don’t find their unique brand of loudmouthed ‘comedic’ water torture amusing – they’ll continue regardless. I had the deep misfortune of sitting behind a table full of Scouse holidaymakers on their way to bargain flights out of Gatwick a few months back. They had descended on a student who was getting off the train at Crewe (actually, I have my suspicions she had a ticket to London Euston but feared she might kill), and mocked her incessantly for the twenty minutes she was on the train. In any other town in the world, this would have been considered rude and worthy of a sharp slap about the ears, but the Famous Scouse Sense Of Humour dictated that the poor girl sat there and endured the constant howling of “What do you study den? Psychology!??!! Psychology??! You reckon we’re all fuckin nuts den do ye? Where you from? Crewe?!?! Crew?!!? I wouldn’t admit dat love! Crewe!?!’. And so on ad nauseum, which may as well be Liverpool’s new Latin motto.

The minute the put upon woman left the train, the lead ape began to assess their performance. “Aw, she enjoyed that bit of banter didn’t she eh? I bet we made her day.’ He seemed blissfully unaware that she would tell everyone she met that day of the morning she spent on the train with the Scousers. And that everyone would nod and groan in sympathy as they remembered their own Morning With The Scousers, from which they are still recovering. If you ever want someone to roll their eyes and groan for any reason, ‘Some Scousers were talking to me on the train’ will illicit that response immediately. The international code for ‘I was bored shitless by some wannabe Ken Dodds’.

This year, a poll was conducted which seemed to bear out the Scouse humour myth, as Liverpudlians were reported to be the funniest people in Britain. What escaped the headline writers was that the respondents were asked to name the people who made them laugh the most, which is not really the same thing. I’d wager that, rather than giggling away at their Best Of Les Dennis DVD, the people in question were actually swapping Scouse Train anecdotes in the pub, and laughing at how one city can breed a people who substitute timing and clever word play for ‘Hitler bombed our chippy’.

Face it Scousers, you’re no funnier than anyone else in Britain, and have no right to the role of Britain’s court jesters. Strange how any other Liverpudlian stereotype brings about much wailing and gnashing of teeth, but that some Scousers are happy to wear a permanent daft grin when outside the City limits, as if they are wandering 17th century clowns looking for a tavern to entertain in return for lodgings and meat. Scousers who are trying to be funny are as exhausting as any attention seeking toddler, without half the comedic skill. Just look at Stan Boardman. Could you spend more than eight minutes in a room with him without trying to claw your own ears off?
It will take a national effort akin to that of the Industrial Revolution to change people’s perceptions now, but wouldn’t it be nice to hear people say ‘You know what, Scousers just don’t make me laugh’. More than that, wouldn’t it be fucking funny?
Originally published in Swine Magazine

When I see pictures on the news of tiny African babies with flies in their eyes and trails of snot hanging from their noses, with distended bellies which seem to have been directly transplanted from darts playing dwarves, and a look of painful resignation to the uncomfortable and pointless death from starvation which inevitably awaits them, I weep. I weep not just because of the overwhelming tragedy of a baby starving to death whilst I whine about McDonalds leaving the cheese off my burger (seriously though, plain cheeseburger still means I want cheese on it), but because I know that within seconds of this ghastly news being broadcast, an even more abhorrent sight will fill my screen. That of Bob Fucking Geldof.

Bob Fucking Geldof (his official full name, at least in my house) sees the plight of Africans as a giant Bat signal, searching the skies of London for any no-talent, long forgotten nonentity who will heed it’s glow. Except there’s no bat sign lighting up the dreary skies of Ladbroke Grove, just a huge pound sign. “Magazine deals!” it throbs. “TV Shows!” it intones. And who should come running but Bob Fucking Geldof, Africa’s last resort.

BFG’s biography is a slim volume to say the least. Or it would have been if every child in Africa went to bed on a full stomach. Having left the prestigious Blackrock College in Dublin in the mid seventies, he went to work for The Georgia Straight, a left wing free paper based in Vancouver. The firey rhetoric of this hippie pamphlet was the breeding ground of Bob’s fervour, and who better than the Canadians to rabble rouse and feed the flames of revolution. It was this Baptism of fire which gave BFG the temerity to pen one of his two hits, I Don’t Like Mondays, about mass murderer Brenda Ann Spencer. Her record of “killed two, injured nine” puts her just ahead of Beth Jordache in the female killer ratings. The single hit number one in 1979 and that should have been that. Four years of Bob Fucking Geldof was four years too many, but at least it was all over, he could go back to Vancouver and take part in a protest against cuts in arable farming subsidies, or whatever the fuck Canadians care about.

But no! Wait! What is that on the horizon? Yes, it’s a tumult of human suffering, and just like the motion picture of Pink Floyd’s The Wall, BFG’s involved again. After seeing the death and starvation which was destroying African lives, Bob thought it would be a spiffing idea to do a charity record to raise money for the poor mites. And it was a brilliant idea. But why did this tone deaf, gutter mouthed wannabe pikey have to get involved past the inception? Maybe because he felt that Trevor Horn didn’t have the necessary production experience to handle a single release? Trev may have produced Welcome To The Pleasuredome which had just sold over 4 million copies, but Bob had been working on Deep In The Heart Of Nowhere, which went on to sell, er, bugger all! No? Maybe then, Bob felt that the assembled rock stars did not have the media skills to front a campaign such as this. How could shrinking violets like Boy George and Marilyn have coped with the spotlight?

Okay, maybe it was that he felt the artists needed a helping hand, with their relative lack of savvy where the music industry was concerned. True, BFG was on the slippery slope to anonymity, but surely he had some sage advice to offer greenhorns like Paul McCartney, David Bowie, James Taylor and Sting. I mean what could they have known about releasing a record? No? Wait, I’ve cracked it. I know exactly what Bob had to offer the Band Aid single. Desperation.
The starving people in Africa were desperate, but even though they had gone without food for so long that their digestive systems were breaking down their internal organs for sustenance, even though they were literally being eaten alive from the inside out, none of them could match the compounded anguish of a man who would sooner punch his own mother in the face on national television than be anonymous. Pundits marveled at the way he ignored the promotional opportunities for his own album release, preferring instead to use his time in the dimming spotlight to underline the plight of tiny starving babies. Well, duh!

Given the choice between being well know for helping the helpless to eke out their pathetic lives, or for being totally and utterly ridiculed for subjecting the British public to one of the shittest albums ever to make someone chew his own ears off, he went for the kudos?! Well, fuck me backwards if he isn’t a modern day saint. The choice he made was one that anyone else in the entire fucking universe would have. Talk about right place at the right time, he clawed his way up from the pit of eternal musical hellfire to plaster his crater face all over the newspapers and to staple his wretched anatomy to the sidecar of fame. Right place? Yeah, after a good few months frenzied assault on the public psyche.

He traveled further to get the ‘right place’ than any other no mark. He made sure he flew out First Class to the US to appear on the recording of We Are The World. One of the hopeless organizers, currently residing in the Where Are They Now files was one ‘Michael Jackson’, how he managed to get it off the ground without Bob’s help I’ll never know. But still the Shining White Hope wasn’t satisfied. He disagreed with Margaret Thatcher! Can you imagine! It was so much of a national sport at the time that we considered it as a Commonwealth Games event, but good show Bob! You tarnished that halo of hers didn’t you?

Nearly a year ago Bob slipped to his lowest point yet. He hadn’t released an album since 2001, and despite over a million letters of thanks he hadn’t finished foisting his tramp-like visage on us just yet. People were beginning to forget about Bob Geldof, so out came the Band Aid 20 single, just in time to make some money, feed some Africans and put Sir Bob back on the agenda. Fair enough it was actually Midge Ure who had the idea of releasing the record again, obviously thinking that anything Bob could flog like a dead mare, he could flog better. That one backfired didn’t it Midge? He needed you to write the frigging thing in the first place, but try and grab some of that limelight for yourself and he’d chop your arm off. The record was horrible and populated by no-mark flashes in a shit stained pan. Turin Breaks and Danny Goffey? Wow! There truly are stars in my eyes! Maybe more money would have been raised by asking each of the desperate, wannabe saviours to pay fifty grand to appear on the record. That would have seen off Lemar for a start.

Then, just as we thought it was safe to enjoy life again, Live 8 was announced. Live 8 , the most pointless, ego massaging irrelevance since, well, Band Aid 20 was an insult to anyone who ever went without to send money abroad. “We don’t want your money, we want you” intoned the fetid pile of bone that is BFG (now Sir Bob Geldof. Obviously, even though it’s an honorary title, making ‘Sir’ Bob as clueless as ‘Professor’ Phil Redmond). And so a cavalcade of pop mediocrity and reanimated corpses (what, you didn’t seriously think Roger Waters was still alive did you?) were treated to the best publicity that African suffering could buy. On average, those who performed were treated to a 120% rise in album sales. 120%!!!!! And lucky us, even Sir Bob was on hand to perform I Don’t Like Mondays, even though any African artists were sent straight back to Matabeleland for even daring to suggest they should be involved. They weren’t commercially viable enough to take up space on the stage, whereas Bob and the Boomtown Rats are on every teenager’s wall. You can’t walk past a youth club in Britain without hearing 15 year olds discussing the relative merits of Mondo Bongo versus V Deep.

The general consensus on BFG is that wishy washy nonsense of “Whatever you think of the bloke, you have to admire what he’s done.” No, actually we don’t. We know all too well what’s going on in Africa. We knew it in 1984 because it was on the frigging nine o’clock news! We saw the exact same report as Geldof, but we weren’t arrogant enough to think that was our ticket to a lifetime of fame, a knighthood and a noble peace prize nomination. If every child went to bed in Africa having eaten three squares, Bob Geldof would end up in a pauper’s grave. If that isn’t an incentive to help Africa, I don’t know what is.
.